ELECTION COLUMN • The election is not yet finally decided, but the results show significant geographical differences in voter support and it now seems impossible for the Tidö parties to secure a victory. At the same time, communists and Islamists appear to have found common ground at the ballot boxes. Samnytt’s Jonas Andersson analyzes the demographics behind the results – and what they may mean for Sweden’s political future.
A recurring theme in the reporting from the election and various election night parties was something I already brought up in my previous column – viewing the election as a kind of football match. You win some games and lose others – and when you lose, you’re expected to be a good sport about it.
But that logic doesn’t hold when the game is rigged. And rigged is exactly what it is now. In such a way that we may never see a right-wing government in Sweden again.
It is people with non-European backgrounds, who have often been allowed into Sweden on false grounds and lightly handed citizenship – even though they often neither know of, care about, nor wish to approach Swedish values, traditions, or culture – who have, in fact, decided the Swedish election.
The election results from the various exclusion areas speak for themselves. The same goes for the Left Party’s major successes. Without these voters, Sweden would have had a right-wing government, likely for a long time to come.
And the Left Party’s successes have come not despite the fact that the party has been exposed as harboring blatant and violent anti-Semitism and hatred of Jews, as well as sympathizing with terror and terrorists – but because it does so.
Jonas Andersson
Rinkeby is an almost painfully clear example of this development. In the Spånga 21 Rinkeby C precinct, the Left Party preliminarily received 51.0 percent of the votes – an increase of an entire 22.5 percentage points compared to 2022 – while the Social Democrats received 39.7 percent.
SEE ALSO: Vote counting: SD COLLAPSES – but close between the blocs
Together, the two parties thus collected 90.7 percent of the votes. Meanwhile, 92.2 percent of Rinkeby’s residents have foreign backgrounds, and 50.7 percent of the entire population was born outside Europe.
And the Left Party’s successes have come not despite the fact that the party has been exposed as harboring blatant and violent anti-Semitism and hatred of Jews, as well as sympathizing with terror and terrorists – but because it does so.
SEE ALSO: Parallel election campaign in Arabic – voters scared with deportation
The US managed to stop it at the last second
Andersson and Dadgostar have succeeded in doing what the Biden administration tried to do in the USA – to flood the country with illegal migrants and, by trading votes for welfare benefits and permission to build mosques and Islamic centers, secure and cement power for the increasingly socialist Democratic Party.

In the US, this was stopped and the trend reversed by Trump. Unlike Sweden, there are large TV channels, newspapers, podcasts, and digital platforms in the US offering a counter-narrative to the left-liberal mainstream media establishment – while Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter/X changed the playing field even further by removing censorship.
The result is an almost all-encompassing pressure where large parts of the Swedish people never encounter a truly competing depiction of reality.
Jonas Andersson
Americans, moreover, unlike Swedes, have never had to be embarrassed in the same way for standing up for a healthy patriotism.
SEE ALSO: Trump warns: Europe risks collapse due to migration
The Swedish media landscape is far more compact and monolithic. The problem is not limited to public service, but also encompasses large parts of the traditional mainstream media, where roughly the same one-sided perspectives on migration, climate, identity, and social development are repeated.
Alternative media do offer a counter-narrative but still work with a fraction of the resources and reach and are constantly fighting an uphill battle.
SEE ALSO: Dagerlind: Tidö should learn from Trump – if they want to win the election
The result is an almost all-encompassing pressure where large parts of the Swedish people never encounter a truly competing depiction of reality.
Open doors once again…
Just as the metropolitan regions of Malmö, Gothenburg, and now Stockholm risk never again being able to form a right-wing government, Sweden as a whole faces the same risk. Instead, an increasingly far-left government, with growing Islamist and anti-Semitic elements, may be the future Sweden has ahead.

And if the left bloc again opens the door for even greater mass immigration, which is likely, the road back may be closed for good.
At the same time, major political changes may be on the horizon in Europe. If Germany, France and the UK, through Weidel, Le Pen and Farage, were to adopt policies with major repatriation programs, the pressure on Sweden’s borders could become enormous – this time from countries in our immediate vicinity, but from people with non-European backgrounds.
We do not yet know exactly how this will end. The left bloc leads by an extremely narrow margin and miracles can still happen. And perhaps it will simply be impossible for Andersson to form a government and the result will be a snap election. // But one thing is clear to me after this election – Sweden has passed a demographic and political tipping point. For the first time we have had a parliamentary election where people who neither see themselves as, feel as, nor want to be Swedish may have decided who will govern Sweden.
Jonas Andersson
This should give Kristersson, Strömmer and Forssell pause for thought as they consider whether it was really so wise to let in nearly half a million migrants to Sweden during the last term of office.
SEE ALSO: Disinformation in parallel Arabic election campaigns – party secretaries called to crisis meeting
Perhaps they can also consider whether it was correct to let SVT and Public Service’s propaganda for the Green Party and the left be amplified with yet more billions.

I myself wonder what they were thinking – and how they think today, if they think at all. Do they understand that this was not just any match? Do they understand that the next match may never be played on the same field, with the same conditions, and according to the rules that once applied?
The Point of No Return?
At the time of writing, there is a difference of only about 29,000 votes between the sides. Seat-wise, the margin is even more distinct: 176 to 173 – three seats. That is exactly the same difference in seats that gave the Tidö parties a majority after the 2022 election, only now with the numbers reversed. And votes still remain to be counted.
SEE ALSO: The nerve-wracking election is not decided – Wednesday’s votes may determine the outcome
So we do not yet know exactly how this will end. The left bloc leads by an extremely small margin and miracles can still happen. And perhaps it will simply be impossible for Andersson to form a government and the consequence will be a snap election.
Perhaps a confused Centre Party member will realize that communism and Islamism don’t quite go together with after-work bubbly at Stureplan – and become an independent MP.
Perhaps Busch will decide to ‘take responsibility’ and join Magda’s team in order to at least try to keep the worst excesses of communism and anti-Semitism away from government power.
SEE ALSO: This could be the election that changes Sweden forever
But one thing is clear to me after this election – Sweden has passed a demographic and political tipping point. For the first time, we have had a parliamentary election where people who neither see themselves as, feel as, nor want to be Swedish may have decided who will govern Sweden.
And that may seal our country’s future forever. We may have passed The Point of No Return.
