Samnytt’s Mattias Albinsson comments in this news chronicle on the reporting of the notorious Nazi assault in Stockholm.

On Tuesday, four men in their 20s were convicted of assault in Stockholm on the night of August 27 this year. The men went out that night and assaulted a number of immigrants.

READ ALSO: Four convicted after the violent night of the Nazi gang in Stockholm

All four men were convicted of aggravated assault, and three of them were also convicted of assault of normal degree.

However, they were acquitted of charges of robbing a third plaintiff.

Political dynamite

That four men with fair skin attack and assault people with, in this case, backgrounds in Africa and the Middle East; it is of course a real Christmas gift for the so-called establishment, which, based on its own political yardstick, is placed on the far-left side.

Media and news sites that often don’t even publish the names of gang murderers or terrorists; citing a creative interpretation of press ethics; publish both names and pictures of all four. Even before they are convicted.

But they make even more politics out of the incident than that.

“The Nazis are convicted – but politicians continue to point out immigrants as a problem,” for example, Dagens Nyheter writes in a text where the blame for the act is placed on politicians who talk about “immigrants as a societal problem”.

It is the politicians’ fault that Sweden has “a social climate where Nazis beat non-whites on the streets,” it is claimed, drawing parallels to the 90s John “Laser Man” Ausonius and New Democracy.

It is wrong that “Johan Forssell (M) almost boasts that the number of asylum seekers to Sweden has decreased”. And the solution seems to be, according to the writer, to increase immigration even more.

As if even more immigration would lead to fewer conflicts in society.

Zero-sum game

Gang crime, dozens of clans, Kurdish foxes, child torpedoes, Ethiopian monsters, honor violence, shot dead fathers of small children, terrorist threats, chaotic Islamists, group rapes, burning cars, humiliated robbed children, dominance behaviors, and all other immigration-related phenomena identified in Swedish society.

Suddenly, all this means nothing.

DN looks at life from a zero-sum game idea that is predominant within the ideological sphere to which its employees belong.

In broad terms, the idea is that if Swedes commit X number of crimes against immigrants, it nullifies Y number of crimes that non-Swedes have committed against Swedes. A kind of witchcraft. Evil is cured with evil. They cancel each other out.

And the evil in a white man’s violence against a “racialized” person is considered many times worse than a racialized person’s violence against a white person. This according to the so-called intersectional perspective prevalent at DN and similar circles; where everything is analyzed based on race, skin color, gender, and social class, while none of this may be mentioned.

A Nazi assault is at least as terrible as a hundred gang murders or a thousand rapes. And this event thus makes a significant impact in the debit and credit in the power relations bookkeeping.

The sum of the crimes of immigrants and Swedes thus approaches zero. The balance sheet adds up.

“Swedish origin”

One could look at the matter in a different way: That as the proportion of immigrants increases in Sweden, so do the conflicts. Partly between Swedes and immigrants; but also, which is perhaps not talked about as much, between different immigrant groups. And that this could be seen as problematic.

But I leave it to others to have an opinion on the matter. I see that many already do.

What I raise more eyebrows about is the press release that the Stockholm District Court issues in connection with the verdict.

“The four men have Swedish origin and have connections to Active Club Sweden (AKS), which is considered a far-right organization with clear racist elements and which engages in martial arts. At least two of the men made Hitler salutes during the relevant night. All plaintiffs have a different ethnic background than the accused,” it says in it.

For some reason, the court suddenly considers it important to point out that the perpetrators have “Swedish origin” and that the plaintiffs have “a different ethnic background”.

A Swedish court has never before marked ethnicity in that way in a press release. Never.

For example, it has never before happened that a Swedish court in a similar way pointed out that the perpetrator is “Somali” or has “Somali origin”. I have searched through the Swedish Courts Administration’s press releases to check.

Incorrect?

It gets worse when it is doubtful if the statement is even correct in substance. It is true that all four convicted men were born in Sweden, but at least one of them has a foreign background.

The man in question, who is sentenced to three years and three months in prison, has a father who immigrated from the Netherlands, and a mother with Hungarian background.

The Netherlands and Hungary; it is probably considered within the left-wing establishment to be white enough to be classified as Swedish in the world of the district court. It would have been different if the perpetrator’s parents came from another continent. Then he likely would not have been described as having “Swedish origin” by the court.

Europe, those are white countries, and their inhabitants can immigrate to Sweden and become Swedes. Unlike someone who comes from, for example, Syria, Somalia, or Kenya. In those countries, there are people who are not and never can become Swedes, is the implied thought.

Sure. But at the same time: Isn’t that exactly how the same concoction of liberals and far-left extremists try to teach us that we should not think?